ISLAM AND SEXUAL REPRESSION
Western psychologists accuse religion of repressing
the vital energy of man and rendering his life quite miserable as a result of
the sense of guilt which especially obsesses the religious people and makes
them imagine that all their actions are sinful and can only be expiated through
abstention from enjoying the pleasures of life. Those psychologists add that Europe
lived in the darkness of ignorance as long as it adhered to its religion but
once it freed itself from the fetters of religion, its emotions were liberated
and accordingly it achieved wonders in the field of production.
Such psychologists often say: Do you want us to return
to religion? Do you want to fetter the emotions which, we the progressives,
have set free? Do you want to embitter the lives of the youth by incessantly reminding
them of what is right and wrong?
Let the Europeans say whatever they like about their
religion. Whether we believe it or not makes little difference at present
because we are not concerned with religion in general: we are discussing Islam.
Before discussing whether or not Islam represses the
vital energy we should define the meaning of repression which has been misunderstood
and misapplied by both the "cultured" and the half-educated.
Repression is not the result of abstention from
performing the instinctive act. It is the result of believing that the
instinctive act is dirty, and of refusing to admit to oneself that such a
motive may come to one's mind or engage one's thinking. In this sense
repression becomes an unconscious feeling which may not be cured by performing
the instinctive act. He who performs the instinctive act but believes that he
is committing a degrading and dirty act is a person who suffers from
repression, though he may commit such an act twenty times a day. Every time he
commits such an act, there shall ensue a conflict within his psyche between
what he has done and what he ought to have done. It is this conscious and unconscious
conflict which gives birth to complexes and psychological disorders.
This definition of repression is not invented by the
writer. It is the definition given by Freud who spent his life in criticizing
religion for repressing people's activities. Freud says in his book "Three
Contributions to the Sexual Theory" (p. 82) that "distinction should be
made between the unconscious repression and the abstention from performing the
instinctive act-which is a mere suspension of the act"
Now that we have come to understand that repression
is synonymous to the feeling that the instinctive act is dirty rather than a temporary
suspension of it, let us proceed with our discussion of repression and Islam.
No religion is as frank as Islam in recognizing the
natural motives and treating them as clean and healthy. The Holy Qur'an says:
"fair in the eyes of men is the love of
things they covet: women and sons; heaped-up hordes of gold and silver, horses
branded (for blood and excellence) and (wealth) cattle and well-tilled lands”
(iii : 14).
In this verse, the Qur'an names the earthly desires
and recognizes them as a matter of fact and states that they are desirable
things in the eyes of men, but does not object to these desires as such nor does
it disapprove of such feelings.
It is true that Islam does not permit people to give
way to such desires or to be dominated or enslaved by adam. If everyone becomes
a slave to his passions, life will be running in the wrong direction. Humanity
aims at development and improvement; it can never achieve such aims as long as
it is dominated by its unruly passions which exhaust all the energy and lead it
downwards to animalism.
Islam does not allow people to descend to the level
of animalism but there is a great difference between this and the unconscious
repression which holds that such passions are dirty in themselves and which
drives people to abstain from even entertaining such feelings in the name of
purification and elevation.
In its treatment of human soul, Islam recognizes, in
principle, all the natural emotions and does not repress them in our
unconscious but it permits the practical performance of such instinctive acts
to an extent such as may give a reasonable degree of pleasure without causing
any harm or injury to the individual or the community. An individual who is
thoroughly absorbed in satisfying his passions bril1gs about an early
enervation of his viral energy. Besides, a person who is enslaved by his unruly
passions will not be fit for doing anything. All his efforts and thoughts will
be devoted to the satisfaction of his desires.
Similarly, the society too suffers a great setback
from the exhaustion of the vital energy of its members in one direction alone
instead of being used for diverse purposes as originally planned by its
Creator, as this leads to the neglect of so many other ends that are no less worthy
of realization. It will also lead to the destruction of family ties and to
social disintegration: "Thou wouldst think they were united, but their
hearts are divided". This makes it very easy for others to attack and
annihilate them like what happened in France.
Subject to the limits that are meant to prevent the
individual from inflicting harm upon his own self, other individuals, the
family or society, Islam permits him full enjoyment of the pleasures of life. In
fact, Islam frankly calls on people to enjoy the pleasures of life. The Qur'an
says: "Say, who hath forbidden the beautiful gifts of God which He hath
produced for His servants, and the things clean and pure which He hath provided
for sustenance?" In another verse the Qur'an says: "And
neglect not thy portion of the world"; "Eat of the good things We
have provided for you"; "Eat and drink but Waste not by excess".
Islam recognizes the sexual instinct so frankly that
the Apostle himself said: "From the pleasures of the world, perfume and woman
were endeared to me; and the delight of my eye is prayer". The sexual
instinct is elevated to the rank similar to that of the best perfume on earth,
and it is bracketed with prayer which is the best means by which men may come
closer to God.
The Apostle once said:
"A man is recompensed for the sexual act he
performs with his wife," and when some of the surprised listeners asked
the Apostle of God: "Is the person rewarded for satisfying his passions?”
the Prophet answered: "'Do you not see that if he were to satisfy it in a
prohibited manner he would be committing a sin? So if he satisfies it in a
lawful manner he will be recompensed." (Muslim)
This is why repression will never originate under the
rule of Islam. If young people feel the urge of the sexual instinct there is no
evil in that, and they need not regard the sexual instinct as a dirty,
repulsive feeling.
What Islam requires of the young people in this respect, is to control
their passions without repressing them, to control them willingly and
consciously, that is, to suspend their satisfaction until the suitable time.
According to Freud, suspension of the performance of the sexual act is not
repression. Unlike repression, temporary suspension of the performance of the
sexual instinct does not overtax the nerves nor does it lead to complexes and
psychological disorders.
This call for controlling the passions is not an arbitrary ordinance
intended to deprive people of the pleasures of life, for history bears witness
that no nation could safeguard its sovereignty without being able to control
its passions or abstain willingly from some permitted pleasures. On the other
hand, no nation could withstand international conflicts unless its people were
trained to endure hardships and were able to suspend the satisfaction of their
desires for hours, days, years as the need of the hour may be.
Hence, the wisdom of fasting in Islam. Some
libertines, when they talk about fasting, say: What is this nonsense which aims
at torturing the bodies with hunger and thirst and depriving man of food,
drinks and the pleasure which he desires to have, and for what purpose? Just to
comply with arbitrary orders unmotivated by wisdom or reasonable end!
To such libertines we should say: "What is man
if he does not exercise his power of restraint? How can he help humanity if he
cannot abstain, even for a few hours, from satisfying his desires? How can we
have the patience to fight evil on earth and deprive ourselves as a result
thereof of so many pleasures?”
How could the communist whose propagandists in the
Islamic East make fun of fasting and other means of self-restraint have
withstood against the Nazis in Stalingrad if
they had not been trained to endure the vilest hardships which tortured both
their souls as well as their bodies. It is strange that these communists
approve of self-restraint when it is ordered by the "State", the
concrete authority that can inflict immediate punishment, but start crying against
it when it is demanded by God, the Creator of the state and all living
creatures.
It is often said that religion embitters the life of
those who follow its rules and lets the ghost of sin haunt them. But this does
riot apply to Islam which mentions forgiveness far more than it speaks of any
castigation.
Sin, according to Islam, is neither a ghoul ever
haunting people nor an endless darkness shadowing their lives. Adam's great
original sin is not a sword unsheathed in the face of humanity, nor does it
require any further purification or ransom: "Then learnt Adam from his
Lord words of inspiration and his Lord forgave him” (ii : 37). Adam's
repentance was accepted simply and without any formalities.
Like their father, the children of Adam are not
excluded from God's mercy when they commit sin. God knows the limits of their
nature and He does not overburden them with what they cannot bear: "On
no soul doth God place a burden greater than it can bear" (i: 286).
The Apostle says, “All the children of Adam are wrong-doers, and the best of
all wrong-doers are those who repent”.
The verses of the Qur'an which describes God's mercy,
forgiveness and repentance are very numerous but we are content to quote the
following verse:
“Be quick in the race for forgiveness from your
Lord, and for a garden whose width is that (of the whole) of heavens and of the
earth prepared for the righteous-those who spend (freely) whether in prosperity
or in adversity; who restrain anger, and pardon (all) men;-for God loves those who
do good; and those who having done something to be ashamed of, or wronged their
own souls, earnestly bring God to mind, and ask for forgiveness for their
sins,-and who can forgive sins except God? -and are never obstinate in
persisting knowingly in (the wrong) what they have done".
"For such the reward is forgiveness from
their Lord, and gardens with rivers flowing underneath,-on eternal dwelling: how
excellent a recompense for those who work (and strive)” (iii:133-136).
How vast and far-reaching God's mercy is! He not only
accepts the repentance of souls but also absolves them of their sins and grants
them His acceptance and kindness and even elevates them to the rank of the
righteous.
After such mercy could there be the slightest doubt
as to God's forgiveness? How could torture and sin haunt the souls of people
when God accepts and welcomes them if they truly utter one word: repentance.
There is no need to quote further texts in support of
our argument. But, nonetheless, we shall quote the saying of the Apostle :
"By He in whose hand my soul doth lie, had you not committed any sin God
should have taken you away to replace with others who would commit sin and ask
God's forgiveness which will be granted to them".
It is, then, the will of God that He forgives
people's sins. In conclusion, we quote this wonderful verse of the Holy Qur'an:
“What con God gain by your punishment, if ye are grateful and ye
believe? Nay, it is God that recognizeth (all good) and knoweth all things" (iv : 147).
Yes, what can God gain by
torturing people when He loves to grant them His mercy and forgiveness?